International Investment Law and EU Law

von: Marc Bungenberg, Joern Griebel, Steffen Hindelang

Springer-Verlag, 2011

ISBN: 9783642148552 , 200 Seiten

Format: PDF

Kopierschutz: DRM

Windows PC,Mac OSX für alle DRM-fähigen eReader Apple iPad, Android Tablet PC's

Preis: 117,69 EUR

  • Nutzergenerierte Inhalte als Gegenstand des Privatrechts - Aktuelle Probleme des Web 2.0
    Datenschutz von A-Z - Schnell und kompakt informiert zum Datenschutz
    Fluch der Weltmeere - Piraterie, Völkerrecht und internationale Beziehungen 1500-1900
    Historische Kriminalitätsforschung
    Festschrift für Dieter Reuter zum 70. Geburtstag am 16. Oktober 2010
    Festschrift 200 Jahre Juristische Fakultät der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
  • Entscheidungen der Verfassungsgerichte der Länder - LVerfGE / Baden-Württemberg, Berlin, Brandenburg, Bremen, Hamburg, Hessen, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Niedersachsen, Saarland, Sachsen, Sachsen-Anhalt, Thüringen

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

 

Mehr zum Inhalt

International Investment Law and EU Law


 

International Investment Law and EU Law

3

Preface

5

Contents

7

Contributors

9

The EU´s Common Investment Policy - Connecting the Dots

13

Introduction

13

Competence and Fundamental Freedom

14

The Relationship between Free Movement of Capital and the Freedom of Establishment

15

The ECJ´s Jurisprudence

15

The Views in the Literature

17

The Scope of Prohibition of Restriction - Equal Treatment and Market Access

19

Jurisprudence

19

Doctrinal Construction of Art. 63 (1) TFEU (ex-Art. 56 (1) EC)

19

Exceptions to the Freedom

21

Evaluation

23

The EU´s External Competences in the Area of International Investment Law

24

The EU´s Investment Competences pre-Lisbon as the Key to its post-Lisbon Competence Conglomerate

24

Implied Competences - The Quest for Their Existence After the Entry into Force of the Lisbon Treaty

25

Implied Exclusive Competence After the Entry into Force of the Lisbon Treaty

27

Existence and Requirements for the Exercise of Implied Shared Competences Before the Entry into Force of the Lisbon Treaty

29

Continued Existence of Implied Shared Competences After the Entry into Force of the Lisbon Treaty

33

The Significance of Implied Shared Competences for Portfolio Investment

35

Evaluation

37

Conclusion

38

The Division of Competences Between the EU and Its Member States in the Area of Investment Politics

40

First Thesis: The inclusion of the provisions on foreign direct investments into the chapter on the Common Commercial Policy re

41

Second Thesis: The transfer of investment policy competences to the EU is supposed to give the EU the necessary legal basis to

43

Third Thesis: The notion ``Foreign Direct Investments´´ is not defined in the Treaty on the European Union nor in the Treaty on

46

Fourth Thesis: The EU Member States have lost their competence to negotiate or conclude international agreements on foreign dir

49

Fifth Thesis: EU Member States do not have the competence to control foreign direct investments of Sovereign Wealth Funds in th

50

Sixth Thesis: EU investment agreements comparable with US investment agreements in their scope of application and quality can o

51

Conclusion

53

The Division of Powers Between the EU and Its Member States ``After Lisbon´´

54

Introduction

54

Three core issues

56

The scope of the new investment competence - FDI versus a modern broad concept of investment

57

The scope of the new investment competence - market access versus investment protection

61

Dispute settlement in future EU investment treaties

63

Conclusion

65

The Future of Bilateral Investment Treaties of EU Member States

66

Introduction

66

The External Dimension: The Future of BITs with Third States

69

The Infringement Proceedings against Certain Member States

69

The EU´s FDI Competence under the Treaty of Lisbon

73

Limitation to FDI

73

Further Limitations to the EU´s FDI Competence?

75

Consequences of the EU´s FDI Competence for the BITs of Member States and European Foreign Investment Policy

78

The Internal Dimension: The Future of Intra-EU BITs

82

Conclusion

87

Art. 351 TFEU, the Principle of Loyalty and the Future Role of the Member States´ Bilateral Investment Treaties

89

Introduction

89

Extent of Transferred Competences

92

Union Competences over Bilateral Investment

92

Extent of the New Competence over ``Foreign Direct Investment´´

92

The Future Role of National BITs and the Principle of Commitment to International Law (Völkerrechtsfreundlichkeit)

94

National BITs from the Viewpoint of Art. 351(2) 2 TFEU

95

The European Court of Justices Recent Jurisdiction on the Topic

96

Art. 351 TFEU and the Impact of European Constitutional Principles

97

Principle of Uniform Application

97

Principle of Loyalty

98

Principle of Effectiveness

99

Consequences of the Transfer of Competences

100

Termination or Amendment of Previously Concluded International Treaties

100

Binding Effect of Older International Treaties Beyond the Scope of Art. 351(1) TFEU?

101

Mutual Consideration During the Transition Period

101

The Lisbon Judgment´s Influence on the New Competence over Foreign Direct Investment

102

Conclusion: The Treaty of Lisbon and National BITs

103

For a Complementary European Investment Protection

104

Legal Arrangements for the Promotion and Protection of Foreign Investments Within the Framework of the EU Association Policy a

114

Introduction

114

Present arrangements for the promotion and protection of investments within the framework of the EU Association Policy and ENP

118

Bilateral arrangements for the promotion and the protection of investments between the EU and the associated countries of the w

120

Bilateral contractual relationships between the EU and its Member States, of the one part, and individual countries of the west

121

Investment promotion and investment protection within the scope of the aforementioned association and stabilisation agreements

124

Bilateral arrangements for investment promotion and protection within the framework of the southern dimension of the ENP

127

Bilateral contractual relationships between the EU and several neighbouring states within the framework of the southern ENP dim

127

Investment promotion and investment protection within the scope of the Euro-Mediterranean agreements

131

Bilateral arrangements for investment promotion and protection within the framework of the eastern dimension of the ENP

135

Bilateral contractual relationships between the EU and several neighbouring countries within the framework of the eastern ENP d

136

Investment promotion and investment protection within the scope of the aforementioned partnership and cooperation agreements

139

Conclusion and perspectives

143

The New Great Challenge After the Entry Into Force of the Treaty of Lisbon: Bringing About a Multilateral EU-Investment Treaty

148

Balancing Investors´ and Host States´ Rights - What Alternatives for Treaty-makers?

150

The Crucial Question of Future Investment Treaties: Balancing Investors´ Rights and Regulatory Interests of Host States

153

Introduction

153

Types of Regulatory Interests

155

State of Necessity and IIA Provisions for the Protection of National Security and Public Order

156

Declaratory Right to Regulate

157

Regulation in the Public Interest

158

Concepts of Achieving a Balance of Interests

159

Pursuing Host States´ Regulatory Interests under the status quo

159

Status quo of IIAs

159

Status quo in international law beyond IIAs

163

Role of tribunals under the status quo

166

Incorporating a Right to Regulate in the Public Interest in IIAs

167

Incorporating the Right to Regulate in the Preamble

168

Incorporating the Right to Regulate in the Respective Standards of Protection

168

Incorporating the Right to Regulate by Drafting Specific Regulatory Clauses

169

Issues of Implementing the Balance of Interests

172

Legal Nature and Legal Consequences of Regulatory Clauses

172

Regulatory Clause as an Exception

172

Regulatory Clause as Justification

173

Focus on Legal Consequences of Regulatory Clauses

174

Preconditions of a Regulation in the Public Interest

174

Using GATT/GATS and WTO Jurisprudence as a Basis for Arbitral Decisions

176

Conclusion

177

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL, THEEUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIALCOMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS

180

REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

192